Laughing Our Brains Out?God is not the author of confusion (1 Cor 14:33)
Copyright © 1995 by Phillip R. Johnson. All rights reserved. ![]()
In a moment I'm going to call down the Holy Spirit. Things like you've never seen will begin to happen. People will laugh. Some will shake and quiver. Others may make strange animal noises. Don't be alarmed by anything you see; it's just the Holy Spirit working in His own special way. We don't put limits on how God can and cannot work. He may even surprise us with something new tonight. So no matter what you see happen, don't be alarmed.A woman from the church staff led in prayer and said, "Holy Spirit, we give You permission to be who You want to be in our midst. We refuse to critique with our minds the work that You want to do in our hearts. We refuse to subject Your work to our little doctrinal tests." When the signal was given for "ministry time" to begin, people flooded to the front to be prayed for by the ministry team. The rest of the service was entirely chaotic.
___________________________________________________
| |
| cha o tic (ka o' tik) adj. 1. marked by great |
| disorder or confusion. 2. characterized by |
| noise, confusion, and tumult. 3. frenzied, |
| disorganized. |
|___________________________________________________|
Among the things we witnessed were these:![]()
Lance, Matt, Doug, and I spent the entire trip back home
(about 90 minutes) comparing impressions. All of us were
shocked and appalled. One thing we all had noticed was
that the entire evening had a decidedly anti-intellectual
thrust to it. I don't mean that bookish types were not made to feel
welcome. By "anti-intellectual," I mean that the
phenomena, the dancing girls, the music, the prayer, and
every aspect of the evening was meant to play to the
emotions and downplay the intellect. Even the sermon
was a full-scale assault on the idea that our minds can
be of any use whatsoever in discerning truth. "Park your doctrine at the door, and get into the feeling
of this," seemed to be what every voice we heard was
trying to tell us. "The Lord cannot do what He wants in
your life if you insist on analyzing it with your mind.
Truth is not important, experience is. Holiness is a
feeling." But doesn't this anti-intellectual, anti-doctrinal
attitude actually work against true sanctification?
After all, here's how Jesus prayed for His people:
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth." Paul wrote, "Be ye transformed by the renewing of your
mind" (Rom. 12:2). In other words, the objective truth of God's Wordand
sound doctrine based on the Word, knowable only with the
mindcannot hinder what the Holy Spirit wants to do in
our midst. On the contrary, biblical truth is the very
instrument He uses to accomplish our sanctification! But what we heard at the Anaheim Vineyard actually
portrayed God as irrational, anti-intellectual, against
doctrine, and not the least bit concerned for objective
truth. This is at the very heart of the error that makes
the "Toronto Blessing" so destructive to true holiness. What I'm suggesting is that the problem with the "Toronto
Blessing" is not simply that Scripture is silent about
many of the bizarre phenomena that are touted. That is
certainly a serious problem, but the real truth is far
worse: The whole movement is epistemologically
antithetical to Scripture. So-called "drunkenness in the
Spirit" is actually the polar opposite of the biblical
means of sanctification. By encouraging people to tune
out intellectually and let their emotions run wild, this
movement is rather plainly in conflict with the Word of
God. On this matter Scripture speaks with absolute
clarity: "God is not the author of confusion" (1 Cor.
14:33). Yet what I witnessed during my visit to the Vineyard was absolute bedlam. (Indeed, this has been true every time I have visited an evening service at the Vineyard, though there seems to be a much more quiet atmosphere on Sunday mornings.) Read the context of 1 Corinthians 14:33especially verse
23: "If therefore the whole church should assemble
together and all speak in tongues, and ungifted men or
unbelievers enter, will they not say that you are mad?"
(NASB). But isn't what we're seeing today in the "Toronto
Blessing" far worse than the scenario Paul was condemning?
Why are so many so eager to defend this movement? Sadly, as the church continues her slide into doctrinal
ignorance and biblical illiteracy, we may actually be
approaching a time of spiritual languor that rivals those
dark days before the Protestant Reformation. How can
anyone who loves the Word of God believe that this signals
true revival?![]() ![]() Phil Johnson
? !
/~\ /~\
@ ..? OO-=?
_( ^) (^ )_
(__ ~_\ [email protected] /_~ __)
/=ooOo=oOoo=========================================ooOo=oOoo=\
| PO Box 4000 * Panorama City, CA 91412 * (661) 295-5777 |
| sola fide * sola gratia * sola Scriptura * soli Deo gloria |
\_____________________________________________________________/
| |||||||||||||